Adversarial evaluation
Test prompt-injection resilience, model robustness, adversarial ML and data integrity with controlled scenarios. Separate model behavior from permissions enforced by the application.
AI Assurance & Security / ENGINEERING SCOPE
Security boundaries and evaluation systems for models, tool-using agents and human-supervised AI.
LAYER / 01
Sources retain provenance, sensitivity and freshness. Untrusted content remains data, not authority.
Dependency: source integrity · Next boundary: Models
01 / The technical problem
Agent authority crosses model, application and identity boundaries. Untrusted content must not acquire the privileges of an operator.
02 / Engineering scope
Test prompt-injection resilience, model robustness, adversarial ML and data integrity with controlled scenarios. Separate model behavior from permissions enforced by the application.
Apply scoped credentials, least privilege, sandboxing, validated arguments and human authorization at the action boundary. Treat multi-agent messages as untrusted inputs.
Connect model and agent telemetry to provenance, versioned evaluations and policy decisions. Model supply chains need artifact identity, dependency review and rollback plans.
03 / Architecture
Record reproducible failures and evaluate mitigations against held-out scenarios. A passing demonstration is not a certification of model safety.
Define requirements, interfaces and acceptance evidence before implementation. Instrument behavior, inject failure and preserve the record needed for review.
Machine / processing
IngestClassifyCorrelateSimulateRecommendHuman / authority
UnderstandPrioritizeJudgeAuthorizeCommandDefine the mission
Start with the operating environment, the constraints and the decision your system needs to support.