LLCSAM.govU.S.-BasedVendor-Neutral

SYSTEMS
ARCHITECTURE
& ENTERPRISE
TECHNOLOGY
STRATEGY

Independent vendor-neutral systems architecture and technology strategy advisory for government agencies, defense contractors, and regulated enterprises.

TOGAF • NIST CSF 2.0 • ISO 27001 • Federal Architecture
Response Time: ~1 Hour • Professional Inquiries Only
18+
Years Enterprise Architecture
3
Framework Alignments
8
Core Capability Areas
~1hr
Avg. Response Time
01 / Why AERLIX

Architecture
Leadership
Without
Vendor Bias

Make confident technology decisions with minimal noise: clear architecture, governance, and roadmaps built for regulated, mission-critical environments.

Our role is to reduce uncertainty. We translate mission goals into architecture decisions, define governance that prevents drift, and create modernization roadmaps that are actionable — not theoretical.

Framework-informed approach:
TOGAF® Standard (EA discipline)
NIST CSF 2.0 (cyber risk outcomes + governance)
ISO/IEC 27001 (ISMS requirements + continuous improvement)
01

Clarity

An architecture north star that teams can execute against — not a theoretical framework document.

02

Discipline

Standards, guardrails, and decision records that scale across programs and persist through leadership changes.

03

Risk Reduction

Security and compliance aligned to architecture outcomes from the start, not retrofitted at the end.

04

Vendor Neutrality

Recommendations based on fit, constraints, and mission outcomes — not platform partnerships or referral incentives.

02 / Capabilities

A Complete
Enterprise
Architecture
Capability

Strategy, architecture, governance, security alignment, and modernization roadmaps — from strategy to execution — in one partner.

NAICS: 541512 · 541611 · 541618
UEI and CAGE available upon request

CAP-01

Enterprise Systems Architecture

Define target architectures, reference architectures, and system boundaries to reduce complexity and enable interoperability across the enterprise.

CAP-02

Technology Strategy & Roadmaps

Translate mission and business goals into a phased modernization roadmap with sequencing, dependencies, and risk controls.

CAP-03

Architecture Governance & Standards

Establish decision forums, architecture review checkpoints, standards, and guardrails that keep delivery aligned to target state.

CAP-04

Cloud Architecture Strategy

Design hybrid and multi-cloud adoption strategies that preserve security posture, control costs, and align platform choices to workload requirements.

CAP-05

Cybersecurity Architecture Alignment

Align architecture decisions with cybersecurity outcomes and governance practices informed by NIST CSF 2.0; integrate security into architecture artifacts.

CAP-06

Regulatory & Compliance Architecture

Create traceability from requirements to controls using ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS principles and regulated-environment constraints.

CAP-07

Technology Portfolio Rationalization

Identify redundancy, risk, and cost drivers; recommend consolidation and modernization paths with clear decision criteria.

CAP-08

Enterprise Integration Strategy

Define integration patterns, API strategies, data flows, and interoperability standards to connect systems reliably.

03 / Engagements

Built to Produce
Decisions and
Deliverables

Clear scope. Clear artifacts. Clear next steps — without vendor lock-in.

EngagementTimelineDeliverables

Architecture Assessment

Current-state clarity, risks, quick wins.

2–4 weeks

Architecture inventory, pain points, maturity findings, prioritized recommendations.

Target Architecture + Strategy Roadmap

Target state, modernization sequence, investment clarity.

4–8 weeks

Target architecture views, roadmap phases, dependency map, risk register.

Architecture Governance Setup

Consistent decision-making, standards that stick.

2–6 weeks

Governance charter, review checklist, reference patterns, decision log template.

Cloud / Platform Strategy

Platform direction, guardrails, workload approach.

3–6 weeks

Landing zone principles, workload placement model, security alignment considerations.

Cybersecurity Architecture Review

Security gaps mapped to architecture, risk-driven plan.

2–4 weeks

Security architecture findings, prioritized remediation roadmap, governance recommendations.

04
04 / Methodology

Structured.
Repeatable.
Outcome-Driven.

Every engagement follows a disciplined process — from discovery to delivery — so you always know where we are, what comes next, and what you will receive.

01

Understand

Structured discovery to understand your mission context, constraints, current state, and strategic priorities.

Stakeholder interviews · Architecture inventory · Constraint mapping · Goal alignment
02

Assess

Evaluate current state against target outcomes: architecture maturity, security posture, integration complexity, and technical debt.

Gap analysis · Risk identification · Maturity scoring · Prioritization framework
03

Architect

Define the target architecture, transition states, and governance model with clear rationale and decision records.

Target state views · Transition architecture · Governance model · Decision log
04

Enable

Deliver a roadmap and governance artifacts that your team can execute — with continued advisory support as needed.

Phased roadmap · Standards library · Review process · Advisory retainer option
05 / Impact

Measurable
Outcomes in
Complex
Environments

Reduce complexity and risk while accelerating delivery confidence.

01

Reduce redundant systems and architecture drift through clear standards and governance.

02

Improve security posture by aligning architecture to cybersecurity outcomes and oversight.

03

Increase interoperability by defining integration patterns and shared interfaces.

04

Improve modernization success with phased roadmaps and dependency-aware sequencing.

05

Reduce vendor lock-in through vendor-neutral evaluation criteria and reference architectures.

Example Outcomes — Anonymized

Regulated Modernization Roadmap

Reduced uncertainty by defining target architecture and sequencing phases for a regulated enterprise environment.

Portfolio Rationalization

Identified consolidation opportunities and risk drivers across a complex technology portfolio.

Security Alignment Initiative

Improved governance and traceability from requirements to architecture decisions for a compliance-driven organization.

All engagements are handled professionally and confidentially.
UEI and CAGE information available upon request.

06 / Options

Flexible Ways
to Work Together

Choose the engagement model that matches urgency, scope, and governance needs. All engagements are project-based or contract-based.

OPT-01

Project-Based Delivery

Best For

Assessments, roadmaps, target architecture definition.

You Receive

Defined deliverables, timeline, artifacts, executive readout.

OPT-02

Architecture Review & Decision Support

Best For

Ongoing programs needing independent architecture validation.

You Receive

Review cadence, risk-based feedback, decision records.

OPT-03

Executive Advisory Retainer

Best For

Leadership decision support and governance maturity.

You Receive

Monthly advisory sessions, rapid reviews, strategic guidance.

OPT-04

Strategy Workshops

Best For

Alignment across stakeholders.

You Receive

Facilitated sessions, structured outputs, action plan.

STANDARDS & FRAMEWORKS

Framework Alignment

Deep expertise across enterprise, security, cloud, and compliance frameworks. Vendor-neutral guidance aligned with industry standards.

Enterprise Architecture

TOGAF 10 • FEAF • DoDAF • Zachman • SABSA

Cybersecurity

NIST CSF 2.0 • NIST 800-53 • ISO 27001 • Zero Trust (NIST 800-207)

Cloud Architecture

AWS Well-Architected • Azure CAF • CSA CCM • FinOps

AI Governance

NIST AI RMF • ISO 42001 • OECD AI Principles

Compliance

FedRAMP • FISMA • SOC 2 • HIPAA

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION

NAICS Alignment

AERLIX Consulting is classified across multiple NAICS categories reflecting our comprehensive scope of systems architecture, technology consulting, and enterprise strategy services.

541512
Systems Design Services
541519
Computer Related Services
541611
Management Consulting
541690
Technical Consulting
07 / FAQ

Straight Answers
for High-Stakes
Technology
Decisions

What you can expect from AERLIX Consulting.

08 / Contact

Discuss Your
Technology
Strategy

Tell us what you're building or modernizing. We respond within 1 business day.

Avg. response time: ~1 hour
Business hours aligned with U.S. federal standards
All communications handled professionally and confidentially

NAICS: 541512 · 541611 · 541618
UEI & CAGE available upon request

Information used only to respond to your request. No spam.